Ah…soon, the debtors prisons, no?

14 Responses to “Ah…soon, the debtors prisons, no?”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. eudaimonia says:

    Ah…soon, the debtors prisons, no?

    Verbatim, the words that came out of my mouth when I was listening to the story about it on NPR.

  2. gracefruit says:

    Hey, ‘God Save the Queen’ is easy to learn. ;)

  3. hilltop says:

    Just one more way to drive a wedge between the haves and have nots. They talk about bankruptcy like it’s a cool thing- run up your bills, go on vacation, max out the credit cards on cool stuff, then bail on the bill! Whoo hoo!

    It is a last resort for many people, good, hard working people that get into trouble by being laid off, medical bills when they’re uninsured, and to make it even harder to get help is nuts. First they take away the ability for medical malpractice and negligence to be compensated, then if you go broke because of it, you’re in the poor house.

    I’m not liking this country and what it stands for anymore. I want it back from the greedy pigs.

  4. davidkevin says:

    There are several relevant posts on this blog, but the one which says the most the best is this one:

    http://slacktivist.typepad.com/slacktivist/2005/03/moral_bankruptc.html

    I respectively suggest reading it before making any further comments about the nature of this bill.

  5. davidkevin says:

    The amazingly prescient Socialist Labor Party had a phrase for it, all the way back in the early ’70s: industrial feudalism.

    We’re coming to it from one direction, China is coming to it from the other. Regardless of the direction from which it comes, it’s a boon for elites and economic captivity for the common people.

    Welcome to Wal-Mart’s World.

  6. fatebound says:

    Oh Canada is an easy one.

    Just don’t make the common American mistake and
    sing it to the tune of “Oh Christmas Tree” –
    contrary to popular belief, they are two different songs.
    :)

  7. davidkevin says:

    I’m not speaking of “statistics”, I’m speaking of whether or not allowing 30% interest is good or bad, whether or not full disclosure of terms in advance is good or bad, whether or not provisions allowing homes to be taken by force of the State to satisfy credit originally granted without security is good or bad.

    If you favor 30% interest rates for consumer loans, hidden loan terms, and people’s homes being taken from them, then you’ll like this bill.

    If you don’t like these things, you won’t. It’s that simple.

  8. davidkevin says:

    > Heck, I was reading someplace that some mortgage broker guy
    > said, “File bankruptcy, you can get a mortgage for a house
    > tomorrow…” Say, what? To which I reply, “How about being
    > responsible and quit putting the burden of paying your debt on me?

    To which I reply “He’s a liar.” You cannot file for bankruptcy one day and get a mortgage the next, literally or figuratively. The statement is absurd.

    Please base your arguments on reality.

  9. davidkevin says:

    I meant “I respectfully suggest…” Sorry about that.

  10. spiderfarmer says:

    I’ve haven’t heard the NPR take on it yet…I’ll have to go dig it out of their archives. Yeah, it’s an astoundingly bad bit of legislation that was written by lobbyists. Our congresscritters are nothing more than corporate whores.

  11. spiderfarmer says:

    Yeah…but crossing the ocean with this much crap…I wonder if we could stow aboard the QE2. ;)

  12. spiderfarmer says:

    heheheh. :)

  13. spiderfarmer says:

    Hmmmm…looks like I missed a bit of an argument?

  14. spiderfarmer says:

    Yeah…I dunno what it’s going to take to cause a revolution…I mean it.

    Seriously, even the Free Republic guys are against this. Every conservative I know is against it. And ya know what my refrain has been?

    You wanted “four more years”….look what *YOU* did to the country.

Share Your Thoughts...